What do football and martial arts have in common? Football
managers / coaches have their systems, which is their strategy of how their
team will play in order to beat all other teams. Every now and then you see a
team come up with a system that dominates their league for a season or two
until the opposition works out how to neutralise it.
In the 1990’s a couple of guys from Brazil did something
similar to the North American martial arts scene. In doing so they helped
kick-start a branch in the arts that went mainstream over the next decade.
Whether you like the outcome or not, I think martial arts owes some gratitude
to anything that shows up weaknesses. There was an influx of acrobatics and
performance art around that time, so that debt of gratitude might be bigger
than we know.
The boys from Brazil had a pretty simple strategy, get the
opposition to the ground as quickly as possible, where they knew they could
dominate them. Fast forward to the present and you have exponents training up
their skills to become well-rounded in striking, grappling and submission. As
competitors become professional, they cannot afford to have an obvious weakness
in their stand-up game or their ground game that an opponent can easily take
advantage of.
And yet, well rounded does not mean equally proficient in
all areas. Exponents still have a particular strength in one area and they tend
to rely on it to win the bout. You now see fights where someone is particularly
strong in stand-up and their opponent is a submissions expert but each is still
skilled in the other areas. An exponent will have sufficient skills to hold off
their opponent’s attack, while they look for the opportunity to attack their
opponent with their own particular strength.
So even though the competitors are much more rounded in
their skills, you could be forgiven for thinking that we haven’t moved very far
from the adage that ‘attack means you want to damage and control your
opponent, while defence means you want to hold off the attack long enough to
attack again’. The result is that your attention is still split between attack and
defence.
When you think about it, everyone
is still on the merry-go-round of strategy; all that happened was that it got
more refined. In some ways it is like a game of paper / scissors / rock where
someone will have a thicker piece of paper and the opponent will have sharper
scissors and someone else has a bigger rock, but everyone has all three
components.
What does this have to do with
fighting multiple opponents? Well firstly, multiple attackers will make you
aware of any weaknesses or delusions you have in that space, especially if the
group is any good. The important point for group attack however, is that you
have to get off the merry-go-round of strategy, as all those strategies and
techniques that you come up with to try and get advantage, will get dismantled
very quickly, especially by higher functioning groups. Your attention cannot be
split between attack and defence; there is no time for that.
If nothing else, just recognise that you will probably need
to think differently when facing multiple opponents. Strategies that can work
well against a single opponent will likely not translate.
As always with group work, train safely and under the
supervision of a qualified instructor
No comments:
Post a Comment