Are these strategies for dealing with multiple attackers really
deadly sins, or was the temptation of the title too much for me – probably a
bit of both.
Whether using these strategies will get you into trouble or
not, really depends on the ability of the group of attackers. With low
functioning groups you might get away with it. With higher
functioning groups there are weaknesses in these strategies that will almost
certainly result in big problems for the individual so I thought it was worth
discussing them.
With any strategy for dealing with multiple attackers, it’s
all about probability of success and each one of these strategies will be no doubt be successful some
of the time. What you should consider is that while these strategies will work on occasion, the success rate on average is
lower than other strategies and that should be front of mind when you determine
the level of risk you are willing to accept.
If you really want to know whether
a strategy or technique has any validity for you in a group attack situation then go and test it in a training environment against a higher functioning group.
1. Go to ground
This is a deadly sin. If you can help it, don’t ever go to
ground in a group attack situation. If you go to ground against multiple
attackers then there is a much greater probability of multiple attackers
wrestling with you and holding you down, allowing other attackers to kick you, or use weapons,
etc. People can be severely injured on the ground against multiple attackers,
so don’t be fooled, it is not a good place to be. You don’t want to be reliant
on the group to stop the attack.
2. Fight two
attackers at the same time
This is a strategy that relies on your opponents being in
exactly the right position for it to be successful. In demonstrations of this,
the attackers are more actors than anything else.
Every now and then you see someone advocating that you can
punch the attacker in front of them and at the same time deliver a kick to the
attacker behind them or something similar.
I dislike this strategy because it splits your intentions
and you stall for a moment to execute it, that is, you fail to keep to the
basic strategy of keep moving.
3. Go after the
leader
I’m not saying that going after the leader may not be
appropriate in certain circumstances, but in a general self defence situation
you would have used up precious time that would have been better spent on
exiting the situation. In fact, while you are trying to identify the leader you
are hesitating and wasting valuable time.
What happens if you go after the leader and get trapped in a
wrestling match? You cannot assume that
you are going to be able to take them out. The reverse may be true and then you
are in real trouble. The leader is also not necessarily the best fighter in the
group.
4. Position
yourself so you can fight them one at a time
The idea is to allow you to attack one person without being
exposed to attack by others. There are various suggestions of how this could be
done, for example:
- Keep your opponents in a line by backing away
from them or by moving around the edges of the group. You position the attacker
you are dealing with between you and the others until he is done, and then you
move on to the next attacker, or you let the next one come to you.
- If you are in the middle of a room, try to stop
attackers getting behind you by positioning yourself in a corner or hallway.
- Use one attacker as a pivot point to act as a shield
allowing you to then throw strikes at oncoming attackers.
It’s a natural reaction to back away from a threat or
attempt to go around it. The problems you face with backing away are that you
cannot see where you are going so you might back into objects or trip over
backwards. Attempting to keep outside the group and continually position
yourself so that one attacker is always in front of you, shielding you from the
others, really relies on the attackers being a low functioning group.
Can you ever rely on none of the group members being able to
fight and that you can easily manipulate all of them? It’s no wonder they
always demonstrate this at walking pace; speed it up and it would likely become
a shambles. Don’t believe me? Try it with a higher functioning group and see
for yourself. Once those group members really come after you there has to be a
huge skill difference between the individual and the attackers for these types
of strategies to work. That hardly helps the average student of the arts.
5. Try to use a
technique
Be wary of any techniques that suggest you can manipulate
your attackers or work some other magic on them. When people try to use a
technique they generally forget the rule of ’keep moving’ and the group can
then focus more heavily on them.
Techniques rarely work under the pressures generated by a
group attack. As the members of a group become more active, the chances of them
being manipulated easily are vastly decreased. In reality, people are not
easily used as shields.
If you are unlucky enough to face a high functioning group,
they will dismantle or effectively shred any techniques, strikes, etc. that the
individual may try.
6. Spend too much
time on one attacker
Sometimes in a group attack you get angry or frustrated with
a particular attacker and you get caught up spending a few moments trying to dominate them. When you do this it enables the rest of the group to focus on you and even the less active members of the group will see an opportunity to have a go at you.
The individual does well in this video, except towards the
end when he slows down to fight one of the attacking group which enables all
three to focus on him.
I saw a youtube video of a promo for a two verses two MMA TV
show. Crazy stuff, but in terms of multiple attackers it demonstrates, especially towards
the end of the video, some of the difficulties encountered when they spend too
much time focusing on one opponent i.e. they begin to get ‘king hit’ from the
side and from behind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT3qmC9PKWQ
7. Attempt to
strike vital targets
This strategy recommends you disable the opponent by
attacking their vital targets. A gouge to the eyes, a hard strike to
the groin, a kick to the shin or knee-cap, a punch to the throat, a hit to the
temple. It goes on and on but you get
the picture.
I actually think this strategy is a deadly sin as it
encourages people to focus too heavily on an attacker and when the opponent is
also moving, it is difficult to get any of these vital target strikes to land
accurately. Ask yourself the question 'what happens if I miss'.
Can you really strike someone that accurately when you are
under pressure and therefore disable an attacker in a multiple attack situation?
Just because the occasional person might be able to do it, does not make it a
strategy for the masses. You might get away with it on the first attacker but that will only active the rest of them. The alternative is you could be on your way, accelerating to the exit
instead of attempting this sort of stuff.
As always with group work, train safely and under the supervision of a
qualified instructor.